[经典版国际贸易合同范本]有关于国际贸易合同范本合同编号：________年__月__日____(售方)为一方，与____(购方)为另一方，签订合同如下：第一条 合同对象依据____年__月__日双方签订的关于合作的协议，在...+阅读
Facing Business Challenges at Levi Strauss
Can a pany be socially responsible and successful？
Levi Strauss & pany chairman and chief executive officer Bob Hass had some problems on his hands. After taking over leadership of the world-famous blue-jeans maker in 1984， Haas had worked hard to revitalize the pany's long-standing mitment to ethical and socially responsible behior. However， changes in consumer tastes and stiff petition from rival clothing manufacturers were hitting the pany hard on all sides. In order to remain petitive， Hass would he to make some tough decisions that could threaten the pany's principles.
The original Mr. Levi Strauss had a simple business mission—make and sell quality work pants for San Francisco's gold-rush miners. However， Strauss also demonstrated a strong social conscience and mitment to employees early on. During the Great Depression ， workers were paid to lay a new floor in the factory until business picked up. By the 1960s， the pany had bee a vocal advocate for racial integration and a leader in corporate diversity programs.
However， by the time Bob Haas （great-great-grand-nephew of Levi Strauss） took over in 1984， the pany seemed to he lost its social conscience. Levi's had expanded aggressively into product lines that were ultimately unprofitable. The pany was bloated ， profits were falling， and management was more concerned with numbers than with values. Haas believed that public shareholders and stock analysts had blurred the pany's vision by demanding short-term profit gains over long-term goals. So with the help of friends and family， Haas bought up the remaining public stock and set out to turn the pany around.
Haas began to streamline the pany， which meant taking the painful step of cutting the work force by a third. To reward and motivate those who remained， he developed an aspirations statement with panywide goals based on ethics， diversity， environmental stewardship ， teamwork， trust， and openness. He backed up his statement by training employees in leadership， diversity， and ethical decision making and also by linking employee pensation to performance in these areas. “A pany's values —what it stands for， what its people believe in—are crucial to its petitive success，” Haas exhorted . “Indeed， values drive the business.” Levi's also spent large sums to reduce the impact of its operations on the environment. At the same time， the pany shed unprofitable clothing styles and refocused on traditional jeans and the new casual “Dockers” products. With revitalized pany values， soaring staff morale， and revamped product lines， Levi Strauss enjoyed double-digit gains in sales revenues and profits.
However， the 1990s brought new crises. First， reports of widespread human rights abuses in some Asian countries led the pany to question the ethics of its operations there. Second， Levi's discovered that some of its suppliers in Asia were making Levi's products with child labor. And third， Levi's own failure to spot new clothing trends， modernize its production facilities， and keep retailers happy resulted in declining jeans sales. The situation worsened as new petitors undercut Levi’s pricing by manufacturing the majority of their products overseas. （Levi's still made half of its products in the United States）。 With demand shrinking， Levi's again found it had too many plants and employees in the United States. But large-scale layoffs could undermine the social values that had once again bee synonymous with the Levi's name. Haas had to find a way to ensure the pany’s long-term profitability while standing by Levi's principles.
If you were Bob Haas， how would you balance your pany's economic needs with its goals for ethics and social responsibility？ How would you deal with suppliers who don't adhere to your pany's values？ Would you take a stand against human rights abuses？ How would you handle the problem of excess capacity and employees？
Meeting Business Challenges at Levi Strauss
Bob Haas knew that Levi Strauss & pany faced an uphill battle . The pany had uncovered violations of its ethical standards among its Asian suppliers. Meanwhile， consumer tastes had shifted while Levi's looked the other way ， and petitors were beating Levi's on price and service. But Haas determined to tackle these problems by refocusing on the original pany strengths： strong mercial instincts and a mitment to social values and to the work force.
In the early 1990s， Haas developed global guidelines addressing specific workplace issues， such as length of work periods， fair wages， respect for the environment， and prohibitions against child labor. To add muscle to these guidelines， the pany began sending inspectors around the world on surprise visits to look for violations. It was during one of these global audits that Haas discovered some manufacturing contractors in Asia employed underage workers， a clear violation of the guidelines. However， most of the children were significant contributors to family ines， and losing their jobs would force them into more inhumane ways of earning money. Wanting to retain Levi Strauss as their customer， the factory owners asked Levi's management what to do. Some panies with strong values confronting this issue might simply instruct contractors to discharge underage workers. But Levi Strauss devised a unique solution with positive benefits for everyone.
The contractors agreed to suspend underage workers but still pay their salaries and benefits. For its part， Levi Strauss paid for school tuition and other education-related expenses with no obligations. When the children reached working age， they were all offered full-time jobs in the manufacturing plants. Everyone gained. The children were able to continue their education and their family ine contributions， the contractors kept their good customers， and Levi Strauss retained its quality contractors while protecting pany values.
Levi's faced more ethical problems in China， where widespread abuses of human rights clashed directly with the pany's ethical principles. So Haas decided to phase out most of Levi's operations in that country over a period of several years. Although some critics argued that the move was just a public relations stunt， and that losing its $50 million annual business in China was small pared to the forable publicity the pany would receive， Levi’s maintained that its only objective was to uphold its own ethical standards. “Our hope is that conditions will change and improve so that we can revisit our decision at some time in the future，” stated one Levi's executive.
The pany could turn to its established ethical guidelines to handle the challenges it faced in Asia， but the another challenge would be harder to deal with. Demand for Levi's products was sagging， so the pany had far more manufacturing capacity than it needed. The problem had several causes： （1） The pany had failed to notice certain fashion trends that petitors recognized early （such as teenagers' preferences for extra-baggy jeans）， （2） the pany had no consistent marketing message （which resulted in its blue jeans being perceived as “preppy” or for older generations）， （3） the pany's slow product-delivery and restrictive pricing policies angered many retailers and prompted some to carry more peting brands， and （4） many petitors produced the majority of their products overseas using more advanced production technology and thus requiring fewer employees， which enabled them to undercut Levi’s prices.
To overe these threats， Haas began a new campaign to listen to the needs of consumers， cut production costs， improve relations with retailers， and refocus its marketing message. Unfortunately， the situation required Hass once again to face the difficult task of laying off large numbers of workers. In early 1997 the pany laid off 1，000 management and clerical employees to se $80 million in costs. Nine months later the announcement was made that Levi's would close 11 U.S. plants and lay off nearly 6，400 production workers， a full one-third of its U.S. work force. The decision was not an easy one， but Haas and the rest of Levi's senior managers saw it as necessary in order to keep the pany profitable in the years ahead. Nevertheless， Haas was not about to let employees just walk out into an uncertain future. Some had been with Levi's for many years. So true to the pany’s high standards for social responsibility， Levi's spent $200 million on severance pay and additional benefits.
Under the generous plan， each laid-off worker received 8 months' paid notice before the job cuts took effect； up to 3 weeks of additional pay for every year of service with the pany； a $500 bonus upon finding a new job； paid health benefits for 18 months； and a $6，000 allowance for relocating， retraining， or starting a new business. In addition， Levi's provided career counseling to employees for up to 6 months， and the Levi Strauss Foundation ge $8 million in grants to assist munities affected by the plant closings.
Conventional wisdom holds that the costs of these progressive solutions placed Levi Strauss at a petitive disadvantage. But Bob Haas believes that decisions emphasizing costs alone do not serve a pany's best interests. And Haas has taken action on this belief time and again.
以下为关联文档：
摸版使用的经典案例“外行看热闹，内行看门道”。让我们通过下面的三个例子来验证一下“万能八条”的万能性。钟老师总结的经典案例一2006年6月29日，李毅中在《谈谈我国的安全生产问题》一文中...
国际贸易经典案例十四：BLACK & DECKERON THE JOB： FACING BUSINESS CHALLENGES AT BLACK & DECKERPower- Tool Maker Has a Remodeling Project of Its Own Nolan Archibald had a bit of a mess on his hands....
国际贸易经典案例十三：StarbucksProduct and pricing decisionsON THE JOB： FACING A BUSINESS CHALLENGE AT STARBUCKSBrewing Up Success NationwideHe you had your coffee yet today？ If so， did you o...
国际贸易经典案例七：Lexmark InternationalFacing Business Challenges At Lexmark InternationalFrom IBM to IndependenceHow do you build a new， independent anization after years of control by a gigantic， g...
国际贸易经典案例九：Hallmark CardsFacing Business Challenges at Hallmark CardsSending the Right Message to EmployeesOne of Hallmark's sympathy cards reads "Please remember that winter's darkne...
国际贸易经典案例一：Gateway 20001. Foundations and challenges of business Facing Business Challenges at Gateway 2000From Farm Boy to Billionaireputers. The odds are slim you will survive， muc...
国际贸易经典案例十二：She s FloristsMarketing and Customer SatisfactionFacing Business Challenges at She's FloristsProfiting from a Bunch of DataWith only $500 in their pockets， Helen and Marty...
模板使用的三个经典案例“外行看热闹，内行看门道”。让我们通过下面的三个例子来验证一下公务员考试申论“万能八条”的万能性。经典案例一2006年6月29日，李毅中在《谈谈我国的安全生产问题》一文...
国际贸易经典案例五：Top of the Tree Baking CompanyFacing Business Challenges at Top of the Tree Baking pany Baking Up Millions You can use a lot of words to describe Gordon Weinberger， the founder of Top of the...
